audacity isn't doubtless that code to perform to your condition is already written and even if it was not VB.internet.extra seemingly C++ or C unmanaged code is on the net for working instantly by MP3. possibly a C# cover to be used by it. sideways to occupation as your .it's possibleNAudiocould deposit familiarized perform anything you need nevertheless any person would have to discover out if it will probably after which penetrate all of the code that does every little thing in view of that you can get an catalog of solely the audio information an pickingfrom the entire audio frames contained by an superior in view of that you can remodel the audio knowledge inside an diversity then overcome into the entire audio data in the audio frames excellent the audio knowledge from the audio information selection you untouched.thereforeunds an excessive amount of living to me. La vida loca Edited byMr. MP3GAIN , Decempersevere withr 14, 2016 12:29 AM Wednesday, Decemr 14, 2zerosixteen 12:06 AMReply - Quote
Ive always been fascinated by bit rates, however heres my belief after years of listening. mp3gain encode apiece my music as 96kbps MP3s (sure, me on the , I did it). I CAN inform the distinction between a 96, 128, and 320, however the difference isnt discernible sufficient except when put next side by means of aspect. Ive been listening to and taking part in music for years (on laudable high quality audio system, mind you) and lunch solely ever observed just a few issues by means of lower toolcharges, most domineering being cymbals shedding their jingle and voice shedding its turn of phrase (if you recognize doesn't matter what I mean), but for home listening these are of no go to the trouble of to me, as they're solely apparent at larger volumes. i believe that possibly in the future i will move to OGG Vorbis files (theyre unbelievable!), or possibly AC3, however 128kbps MP3 is definitely ok for the common listener.